Japan whistleblower sidelined despite court ruling

Daily Legal News

An employee at Japanese medical equipment maker Olympus said Wednesday
that his humiliating treatment has not changed despite a Supreme Court
ruling that his demotion for whistleblowing was illegal.

Masaharu Hamada said he is still isolated in the office and after last
month's court judgment is not given any work. His was the first
whistleblower case to reach Japan's highest court.

His lawyer Koichi Kozen said Hamada may have to file another lawsuit,
complaining of human rights violations. Japan remains behind Western
countries in penalizing companies that fail to abide by court rulings,
and some fines are so small companies would rather pay up than abide,
Kozen said.

"We would hope the company would respond quickly, but there has been
no response," Kozen said. "We want Mr. Hamada to get a new assignment,
where he can be happy."

Hamada, 51, an Olympus salesman with experience in the United States,
first sued in 2008, alleging punishment for relaying a supplier's
complaint.

He is considered a whistleblower in Japan because he raised questions
about colleagues' professional behavior and was subjected to bizarre
and humiliating punishment, such as taking rudimentary tests.

Related listings

  •  FBI investigates missing $17M in trust funds

    FBI investigates missing $17M in trust funds

    Daily Legal News 07/09/2012

    The FBI is investigating the apparent theft of $17 million from Northern California trust fund accounts.The San Jose Mercury News says the money has vanished from the trust funds of dozens of Santa Clara County residents who relied on a money manager...

  • Cal Supreme Court rules in child death case

    Cal Supreme Court rules in child death case

    Daily Legal News 07/06/2012

    Welfare officials can take children from parents who negligently cause the death of a son or daughter, such as failing to place them in a car seat, even if there was no criminal harm, the California Supreme Court ruled.The court ruled Thursday that a...

  • Wis. court won't rehear union case without justice

    Wis. court won't rehear union case without justice

    Daily Legal News 07/03/2012

    The state Supreme Court won't reconsider a lawsuit challenging Gov. Scott Walker's collective bargaining law without Justice Michael Gableman. Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne had argued Republicans violated the state's open meetings law d...

 

Illinois Work Injury Lawyers – Krol, Bongiorno & Given, LTD.

Accidents in the workplace are often caused by unsafe work conditions arising from ignoring safety rules, overlooking maintenance or other negligence of those in management. While we are one of the largest firms in Illinois dedicated solely to the representation of injured workers, we pride ourselves on the personal, one-on-one approach we deliver to each client.

Work accidents can cause serious injuries and sometimes permanent damage. Some extremely serious work injuries can permanently hinder a person’s ability to get around and continue their daily duties. Factors that affect one’s quality of life such as place of work, relationships with friends and family, and social standing can all be taken away quickly by a work injury. Although, you may not be able to recover all of your losses, you may be entitled to compensation as a result of your work injury. Krol, Bongiorno & Given, LTD. provides informed advocacy in all kinds of workers’ compensation claims, including:

• Injuries to the back and neck, including severe spinal cord injuries
• Serious head injuries
• Heart problems resulting from workplace activities
• Injuries to the knees, elbows, shoulders and other joints
• Injuries caused by repetitive movements

For Illinois Workers’ Compensation claims, you will ALWAYS cheat yourself if you do not hire an experienced attorney. When you hire Krol, Bongiorno & Given, Ltd, you will have someone to guide you through the process, and when it is time to settle, we will add value to your case IN EXCESS of our fee. In the last few years, employers and insurance carriers have sought to advance the argument that when you settle a case without an attorney, your already low settlement should be further reduced by 20% so that you do not get a “windfall.” Representing yourself in Illinois is a lose-lose proposition.