The Law Firm of Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Launches an Investigation

Lawyer News

Levi & Korsinsky is investigating the Board of Directors of Fushi Copperweld, Inc. ("Fushi" or the "Company") (NasdaqGS: FSIN | PowerRating) for possible breaches of fiduciary duty and other violations of state law in connection with the receipt of a proposal from Fushi's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Li Fu ("Mr. Fu") and Abax Global Capital (Hong Kong) Limited ("Abax") to acquire all the outstanding shares of Common Stock of Fushi not currently owned by Mr. Fu and his affiliates. Under the terms of the proposed transaction, Fushi shareholders will receive $11.50 in cash for each share of Fushi common stock for a total transaction value of approximately $433.8 million. Mr. Fu and his affiliates own approximately 29.2% of Fushi's Common Stock.


Click here to learn how to join the action: http://www.zlk.com/fushi-fsin.html, or call: 877-363-5972.
The investigation concerns whether the Fushi Board of Directors breached their fiduciary duties to Fushi stockholders by failing to adequately shop the Company before entering into this transaction and whether Mr. Fu is underpaying for Fushi shares, thus unlawfully harming Fushi stockholders. In particular, at least one analyst set a price target for Fushi stock at $18.00 per share and Fushi common stock has trades as high as $12.76 as recently as April 9, 2010.


If you own common stock in Fushi and wish to obtain additional information, please contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. either via email at jlevi@zlk.com or by telephone at (212) 363-7500, toll-free: (877) 363-5972, or visit http://www.zlk.com/fushi-fsin.html.
Levi & Korsinsky has expertise in prosecuting investor securities litigation and extensive experience in actions involving financial fraud and represents investors throughout the nation, concentrating its practice in securities and shareholder litigation. The attorneys at Levi & Korsinsky have been appointed by numerous courts throughout the country to serve as lead counsel on behalf of shareholders in major litigations involving mergers and acquisitions.

Related listings

  • Florida foreclosure law firm lays off hundreds

    Florida foreclosure law firm lays off hundreds

    Lawyer News 11/06/2010

    A Florida law firm once used by mortgage finance giants Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae and now under investigation for its handling of foreclosure cases has laid off hundreds of employees, a lawyer for the firm's owner said on Thursday. The Florida attor...

  • Lovells, Hogan Managers Approve Law Firm Merger Plan

    Lovells, Hogan Managers Approve Law Firm Merger Plan

    Lawyer News 11/02/2010

    Officials at the Washington-based Hogan & Hartson law firm and London-based Lovells said Thursday that they are discussing a possible merger, a move that would make the combined entity one of the largest law firms in the world, with 2,500 lawyers...

  • Law firm drops Adorno's name after suspension .

    Law firm drops Adorno's name after suspension .

    Lawyer News 11/02/2010

    Hank Adorno's law firm has dropped his name from the letterhead. Adorno & Yoss, which Adorno founded in 1986 with two other lawyers, announced Monday it was officially changing its name to Yoss LLP following Adorno's suspension by the Florida Sup...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.