Class action lawsuit against United Water could cost millions

Lawyer News

Several Union City residents have filed a class action lawsuit against United Water on allegations that the company cheated customers by selling them useless warranties that do not cover repairs.


The warranties, which cost about $150 a year, are supposed to cover the repair of broken water pipes, sewer pipes and other items, the attorneys for three 18th Street plaintiffs, said. Although the application says "Guaranteed Acceptance" in large print, there are actually many exclusions, the attorneys said.


Multi-unit dwellings are actually excluded from the warranty, but that has not stopped United Water from marketing and selling the policies to the owners of multi-unit buildings, the lawsuit says.


The suit was recently filed in Bergen County Superior Court in Hackensack, where United Water is based.



Attorneys Carl Mayer and Bruce Afran held a press conference Tuesday at the courthouse. Afran estimated that if all New Jersey residents in a situation similar to the plaintiffs were to join the suit, and the suit was successful, it could cost United Water as much as $50 million.

Related listings

  • Historic RICO ruling against Cook County Board of Review

    Historic RICO ruling against Cook County Board of Review

    Lawyer News 11/20/2010

    The Federal Court of the Seventh Circuit sustained both civil RICO and Honest Services charges in the suit against Cook County Board of Review Commissioners Larry Rogers Jr., Joseph Berrios and Brendan Houlihan, along with members of their senior sta...

  • After 30 Years, Solo Moves Practice From Barn to Big Law

    After 30 Years, Solo Moves Practice From Barn to Big Law

    Lawyer News 11/06/2010

    Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney has added to its white-collar defense practice through the addition of a 40-year veteran with experience representing the likes of John E. du Pont and former congressman Edward M. Mezvinsky. Tom Bergstrom was scheduled...

  • The Law Firm of Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Launches an Investigation

    The Law Firm of Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Launches an Investigation

    Lawyer News 11/06/2010

    Levi & Korsinsky is investigating the Board of Directors of Fushi Copperweld, Inc. ("Fushi" or the "Company") (NasdaqGS: FSIN | PowerRating) for possible breaches of fiduciary duty and other violations of state law in connection with the receipt ...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.